Fathers And Crows: pp. 1-106

Posted on May 25, 2005 by Tito

This week I started off reading my first WTV, Fathers and Crows, and managed to read pages 1-106. The reading was done primarily in two sittings. While reading this book, I’d also read Invisible Cities and about half of Norwegian Wood, got a little sun and had some jury duty. Go!

The Skinny: I started out confused, but am beginning to find my groove. You know how sometimes you come across a book so engrossing, that you "wish it would keep going"? Well, my spider senses tell me that this will be one of these books. Except that at around 1000 pages (along with the other cycles of the Seven Dreams sequence) I won’t run out of reading quite so quickly. "Food for thought, so get a buffet plate. With lyrics so phat you might gain weight" comes to mind as I am starting to get a taste for the WTV smorgasbord.

More below…

The Dedication
The Dedication is presented in two parts: one for those the book is for, those it is against. The latter:

This book is dedicated against all dogmatists* and their armies (in which the above may have enlisted). Whoever they are, I cordially with them a warm stay in Hell.

THE AUTHOR

So begins my first summer book**.  As
a WTV newbie, the word I keep remembering from Ed’s descriptions is
"grit", and the dedication seems to fit the bill.

From "what I’ve heard", I get the impression that WTV does not
entirely separate himself from his work, and I’m not sure whether or
not I should as a reader (I usually try). I’ll start off by trying –
and see how long that lasts — in small part because the dedication is
from THE AUTHOR (presumably WTV himself, but he also concludes an
introductory paragraph with the signature, "William The Blind" closing
the paragraph that includes:

…until at last I am
successful in steadiness, deviating from my history no greater distance
than that equal to the radius of a needle’s eye: – viz., the
proverbial entrance to the Kingdom of Heaven (which I, William the
Blind, have seen with my own eyes).

So there. Also
included is a detailed contents listing, along with appendices,
glossaries, etc.. which are included as an aid to the reader (a la
Orwell’s New-speak references) and fit quite well, and do not come off as a gimmick appendage you
may find in other meta-aware books.

Crow-Text (pp. 1-22)
This first section had me
scared by its difficulty. It is a jumbled stream (including drawings,
maps and various typefaces). From all this I did glean a few things.
Hopefully this chapter will make more sense once I’ve gotten further
along in the book.

There is much talk of Saints and spiritual figures, in particular one who is alternately referred to as Catherine Tegahkouita, Catherine Tekakwitha & Kateri Tkakwitha and the narrator’s mystical, devotional quest/pilgrimage for the relics of this Blessed ‘Lily of the Mohawks’.

Also dominating this first chapter is nebulous citations of "The Points" that may be related to Ignatius‘ spiritual exercises, though for now I am ignorant of both.

As
mentioned earlier, different typefaces are employed in the text,
including a super-sized "RIVERS" in the sentence (pg 7), "And yet in
this tales of Fathers and Crows, the word writ in grandest majuscule must be RIVERS."
Indeed, as we read on, not only are the rivers of Canada key elements,
but there is the "Stream of Time" that will be referenced repeatedly in
the first 106 pages (and likely more):

There are so
many rivers in their Country, in fact, the Canadians classify them,
letting some, the middling ones be rivieres, while the grander ones
they call fleuves. The town of Three Rivers has three rivieres. But the
way from Kebec to Montreal is the Fleuve Saint-Lauren. – The Stream of
Time is neither fleuve nor riviere as we begin, but rather a mild
little brook, time being mild, meaning no harm to the leaves it whirls
away, exerting no effort.

Enough of all this,
though. It is a relatively short chapter that I suspect sets ups many
things that will make more sense to me later. Since it’s a long book, I
pretty much plowed this opening  as part of a blitzkrieg of pages of
turned, seeking momentum, a current of inducted  interest brought on
by brute force (a strategy that worked well in my reading of
Baudolino, and its challenging opening chapter). Whether this was the best course remains to be seen. I will
keep Catherine/Kateri, The Points and  The Stream of Time in the back
of my mind is I blaze away. Besides, I will contentedly, lazily make due
with this takeaway:

This book is the story of how the Black-Gowns [Jesuits] and the Iroquois between them conquered the Huron people.

Get It? Got It? Good. Forging ahead…

Fathers and Crows

1. Kingdom Come or, How the Black-Gowns Sailed to Canada (pp 23+)

At this point, the books  turns to a more readable, plotty narrative
of the French’s first forays into Canada. This story seems to be akin
to historical fiction, but doesn’t seem to jibe with other books I’ve
read in that genre (supposing it is a genre). This essay by James Gibbons at Bookforum uses the term imaginitive fiction,
and the description seems apt. The only character I remember from my
elementary school days is Samuel de Champlain. In Fathers and Crows, he
is taken from the pedestal he’d assumed in my memory/imagination,
rendered much more human – often the target of ridicule and scorn of
his compatriots. Within the first 100 pages WTV has naturally overcome one obstacle in historical / imaginitive fiction — breathing life into characters already long embalmed in the tomes of history.

The landing of the Black Robes is first told from the perspective of the native Micmc/Souriquois/People –again, WTV highlights how people/places have different names by different sources from different times  –, beginning with the prescient visions of Born Swimming who foresees the ‘Floating Island’ to come. Later, the story doubles back and is told from the perspective of the French travelers. Suffice to say many characters are deftly introduced with appropriate glimpses forward and back in time.

Along with the historic jumping about, WTV encourages the reader (me) directly at points where the text seems to meander or mozy. On page 39, for instance:

(I beg you, by the way, not to think that the pages which already lie behind you are but fallen leaves of meaninglessness in an interminable forest of digressions – indeed, did I not know the end of this story I myself would despair. For already Savages, priests and harlots have slipped through our fingers, and it seems that we but grasp water. What will come next? Will I persist in my pretensions that this book has to do with the reduction of those pagan Huron Nations to faith and reason, when – now it comes out – we shall not even get our first glimpse of their Country for two or three hundreds of pages? – Yes! I refuse to say otherwise. For history is like a string that the cat has swallowed: – drawing events and events from the poor creature’s throat, one is surprised at how much must be disgorged.

Some may find such asides indulgent, but WTV times them well without coming off as fancy. And personally, I appreciate the thoughtfulness – I’m willing to put up with a lot, as long as I feel like I’m in the loop, so to speak.

With that, I sign off on my first entry in the Voll-Tron log. Hopefully you found something here worth your while. I’m admittedly not a writer/reviewer / critic and gladly take any criticisms you care to offer. (Of course,  my BMK money back guarantee is in effect, as always.)



* William Safire took on the "ist" suffix in one of his weekly articles, describing its use as a pejorative modifier (Islamist, Christianist, etc…)

** Other Summer Books: Paradise (AL Kennedy), The Mysterious Flame of Queen Loana (U Eco), The Master (C Toibin)

» Filed Under Books, Voll-Tron (William T. Vollmann A Go Go)

Comments

2 Responses to “Fathers And Crows: pp. 1-106”

  1. ed on May 26th, 2005 3:53 pm

    Good stuff, Tito!

  2. Dave on July 9th, 2007 1:44 pm

    I’m sure you’ve finished reading this tomb by now; your a much quicker page turner than I.

    Did you ever find out more on Catherine? She, like many of the other characters mentioned in this lengthy imaginitive/history/fiction, actually lived. There’s quite an interesting history that revolves about her.

    Thanks for your words by the way. It is quite an undertaking to take on a book of this magnitude and the encouragement is welcomed.

  • subscribe