<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Black Market Kidneys &#187; Statistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/category/statistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog</link>
	<description>In Five Years This Blog Will Be Completeley Legitimate.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:27:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>0 subscribers</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2009/01/20/0-subscribers/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2009/01/20/0-subscribers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2009/01/20/0-subscribers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


0 subscribers, originally uploaded by bigoteetoe.


Amazingly, 0 subscribers to http://www.whitehouse.gov/feed/blog (according to bloglines, at least)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: left; padding: 3px;">
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/titoperez/3213493530/" title="photo sharing"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3499/3213493530_80fcfdc0db.jpg" style="border: solid 2px #FFFFFF;" alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 0.8em; margin-top: 0px;"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/titoperez/3213493530/">0 subscribers</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/titoperez/">bigoteetoe</a>.</span>
</div>
<p>
Amazingly, 0 subscribers to <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/feed/blog">http://www.whitehouse.gov/feed/blog</a> (according to bloglines, at least)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2009/01/20/0-subscribers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>linguistic</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/11/02/linguistic/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/11/02/linguistic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/?p=1554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to The Internet, I am &#8220;linguistically&#8221; intelligent.
Your result for Howard Gardner&#8217;s Eight Types of Intelligence Test&#8230;
Linguistic
31% Logical,  20% Spatial,  61% Linguistic,  18% Intrapersonal,  8% Interpersonal,  41% Musical,  16% Bodily-Kinesthetic and  39% Naturalistic!


&#8220;Verbal-linguistic intelligence has to do with words, spoken or written. People with verbal-linguistic intelligence display a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to The Internet, I am &#8220;linguistically&#8221; intelligent.</p>
<p><em>Your result for Howard Gardner&#8217;s Eight Types of Intelligence Test&#8230;</em></p>
<h4>Linguistic</h4>
<p>31% Logical,  20% Spatial,  61% Linguistic,  18% Intrapersonal,  8% Interpersonal,  41% Musical,  16% Bodily-Kinesthetic and  39% Naturalistic!</p>
<p style="text-align:center"><img src="http://cdn.okcimg.com/php/load_okc_image.php/images/0x0/0x0/0/12637356656465928895.gif" width="320" height="381" /></p>
<div>
<p>&#8220;Verbal-linguistic intelligence has to do with words, spoken or written. People with verbal-linguistic intelligence display a facility with words and languages. They are typically good at reading, writing, telling stories and memorizing words and dates. They tend to learn best by reading, taking notes, listening to lectures, and via discussion and debate. They are also frequently skilled at explaining, teaching and oration or persuasive speaking. Those with verbal-linguistic intelligence learn foreign languages very easily as they have high verbal memory and recall, and an ability to understand and manipulate syntax and structure.</p>
<p>Careers which suit those with this intelligence include writers, lawyers, philosophers, journalists, politicians and teachers.&#8221; (Wikipedia)</p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.helloquizzy.com/tests/howard-gardners-eight-types-of-intelligence-test">Take Howard Gardner&#8217;s Eight Types of Intelligence Test</a> at <a href="http://www.helloquizzy.com/"><b style="color:#131313"><span style="color:#ac000c">H</span>ello<span style="color:#ac000c">Q</span>uizzy</b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/11/02/linguistic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hee-Haw! Got y&#8217;all in check!</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/08/27/hee-haw-got-yall-in-check/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/08/27/hee-haw-got-yall-in-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 16:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turf Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Springsteen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Acres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/?p=1533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack Schultz at BoomtownUSA feels compelled to compare the state of North Dakota with the city of San Francisco, and decides that North Dakota is superior to San Francisco in every way. I occasionally check in on the BoomtownUSA feeds in my bloglines to read about small-ish (usually mid-western) towns &#8212; the kind of towns [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Schultz at BoomtownUSA feels compelled to compare the <em>state</em> of North Dakota with the <em>city</em> of San Francisco, and decides that <a href="http://boomtownusa.blogspot.com/2008/08/green-acres-nd-vs-sf.html">North Dakota is superior to San Francisco in every way</a>. I occasionally check in on the <a href="http://boomtownusa.blogspot.com/">BoomtownUSA</a> feeds in my bloglines to read about small-ish (usually mid-western) towns &#8212; the kind of towns that I reserve a soft spot for. The logical path (buffeted by statistics!) to his conclusion is certainly flawed  but how worked up can I really get when his blog post was apparently inspired by the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymCX7_2-PwY">Green Acres Theme</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/08/27/hee-haw-got-yall-in-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2:42</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/04/25/242/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/04/25/242/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last.fm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/04/25/242/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff has the scoop on the perfect song length &#8212; apparently 2:42. Since he showed us his, I&#8217;ll show you mine.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff has the scoop on the perfect song length &#8212; apparently 2:42. Since <a href="http://syntaxofthings.typepad.com/syntax_of_things/2008/04/the-perfect-len.html">he showed us his</a>, I&#8217;ll show you mine.</p>
<p><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3025/2441059209_13e7c9370b.jpg"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/04/25/242/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Updike: Early Sabermetrician?</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/03/31/john-updike-early-sabermetrician/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/03/31/john-updike-early-sabermetrician/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberal Media Conspiracies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last.fm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/03/31/john-updike-early-sabermetrician/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Posnanski sez:

Iâ€™ve always thought that the patron saint of â€œclutch hitting is a mythâ€ is not Bill James at all, but rather the author John Updiike. In his famous, â€œHub Fans Bid Kid Adieuâ€ story about Ted Williams final game, he wrote:
â€œFor me, Williams is the classic ballplayer of the game on a hot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Posnanski <a href="http://joeposnanski.com/JoeBlog/2008/03/31/60-not-so-deep-minutes/">sez</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Iâ€™ve always thought that the patron saint of â€œclutch hitting is a mythâ€ is not Bill James at all, but rather the author John Updiike. In his famous, â€œHub Fans Bid Kid Adieuâ€ story about Ted Williams final game, he wrote:</p>
<p><em>â€œFor me, Williams is the classic ballplayer of the game on a hot August weekday, before a small crowd, when the only thing at stake is the tissue-thin difference between a thing done well and a thing done ill. Baseball is a game of the long season, of relentless and gradual averaging-out. Irrelevanceâ€”since the reference point of most individual games is remote and statisticalâ€”always threatens its interest, which can be maintained not by the occasional heroics that sportswriters feed upon but by players who always care; who care, that is to say, about themselves and their art. Insofar as the clutch hitter is not a sportswriterâ€™s myth, he is a vulgarity, like a writer who writes only for money.â€</em>
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/03/31/john-updike-early-sabermetrician/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>bitch is the new black</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/25/bitch-is-the-new-black/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/25/bitch-is-the-new-black/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask The Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robot Brains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last.fm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/25/bitch-is-the-new-black/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[new time suck found (google hot trends)as i descend into parts of the internet i never new existed, as I ponder questions such as:

Will #29 tawny kitaen be able to catch up with #28 norman mailer?
Curious as to the interest in #58 (obama turban) but when you consider that it falls well behind #45 sasquatch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new time suck found (<a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends">google hot trends</a>)as i descend into parts of the internet i never new existed, as I ponder questions such as:</p>
<ul>
<li>Will #29 <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?q=tawny+kitaen&#038;date=2008-2-25&#038;sa=X">tawny kitaen</a> be able to catch up with #28 <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?q=norman+mailer&#038;date=2008-2-25&#038;sa=X">norman mailer</a>?</li>
<li>Curious as to the interest in #58 (<a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?q=obama+turban&#038;date=2008-2-25&#038;sa=X">obama turban</a>) but when you consider that it falls well behind #45 <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?q=sasquatch+festival&#038;date=2008-2-25&#038;sa=X">sasquatch festival</a>, I may be able to sleep that much easier.</li>
<li>But look out! <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?q=obama+somali&#038;date=2008-2-25&#038;sa=X">He might be somali</a> (#89)</li>
<li>Larry Bird #33 is <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?q=gary+busey&#038;date=2008-2-25&#038;sa=X">gary busey</a>. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyte_Funky_Ones">LFO</a> nowhere to be seen.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends?q=rashomon&#038;date=2008-2-25&#038;sa=X">rashomon</a> kickin&#8217; in at #90 is nice to see</a></li>
</ul>
<hr />
<strong>bonus</strong>: <a href='http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/lfo-lfo-01-summer-girls.mp3' title='Summer Girls'>LFO &#8211; Summer Girls [MP3]</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/25/bitch-is-the-new-black/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/lfo-lfo-01-summer-girls.mp3" length="3647589" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In which I assert my math-geek prowess</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/22/in-which-i-assert-my-math-geek-prowess/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/22/in-which-i-assert-my-math-geek-prowess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal Victories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stickin' It To The Man]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last.fm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/22/in-which-i-assert-my-math-geek-prowess/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Mr. Hamill,
Every day there are countless factual errors in your newspaper.  I forgive most every one&#8211;it&#8217;s surely hard work to meet a deadline day in and day out.  Every day there are also a handful of cringeworthy efforts at cleverness.  These gratuitous wastes of ink are, with rare exception, less forgivable. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear <a href="http://www.fairness.com/resources/relation?relation_id=65388&amp;offset=">Mr. Hamill</a>,</p>
<p>Every day there are countless factual errors in your newspaper.  I forgive most every one&#8211;it&#8217;s surely hard work to meet a deadline day in and day out.  Every day there are also a handful of cringeworthy efforts at cleverness.  These gratuitous wastes of ink are, with rare exception, less forgivable.  And when these cloying turds are combined with errors, I feel it my duty to ask you to, please, knock it the fuck off.</p>
<p>You could have been cute by saying something something about &#8220;moving the decimal point a few notches to the left&#8221; but, no, you had to bring the square root into the equation.  (See that, clever pun, eh?).  But rest assured, the square root of 1% is 10%, so, good sir, you fail in this sentence: &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/22/us/22peace.html?_r=1&amp;ref=us&amp;oref=slogin">But for decades he struggled to reach enough people, even though he lowered the necessary figure to the square root of 1 percent.</a> &#8221;  </p>
<p>No transcendence for you.</p>
<p>PS: while we&#8217;re on the subject of square roots, I dust off my favorite math joke:</p>
<p>Q:  What&#8217;s the square root of 69?<br />
<span id="more-1430"></span><br />
A:  <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;q=square+root+%2869%29">Ate something</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/22/in-which-i-assert-my-math-geek-prowess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grand Central</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/06/grand-central/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/06/grand-central/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[For The Record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The En-Vir-On-Ment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Man Stickin It To Us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last.fm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/06/grand-central/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every night, the last bit of terrestrial Manhattan I see is Grand Central Station, and I do not surface again until I&#8217;m looking down onto my home in Brooklyn.  It serving as my wormhole, then, I was curious enough to watch the American Experience episode on its construction this week.
It also has to do [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every night, the last bit of <a href="http://www.observer.com/files/imagecache/article/files/explosion2.jpg">terrestrial Manhattan </a>I see is Grand Central Station, and I do not surface again until <a href="http://www.yelp.com/biz/smith-9th-sts-station-brooklyn#hrid:1OopupNrC6uKq495_fqLEg">I&#8217;m looking down onto my home in Brooklyn</a>.  It serving as my wormhole, then, I was curious enough to watch the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/grandcentral/">American Experience episode on its construction this week</a>.</p>
<p>It also has to do with the fact that I find history so much more interesting now than I did as a child.  Youth is wasted on the young I suppose.  <span id="more-1416"></span></p>
<p>It was intriguing to learn that the Upper East Side of Manhattan was <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/grandcentral/gallery/g_01.html">replete with coal-belching locomotives </a>in the late 20th Century, and fun to be reminded that the man who founded my alma mater was one of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornelius_Vanderbilt">original robber barons</a>.</p>
<p>Most compelling, though, was the ramifications of a <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/grandcentral/news/1902.html">fatal mishap in 1902</a>, that was likely inevitable given the congestion of heavy steel running into the old terminal.  The deaths led to a public outcry over safety, which fanned the dissent over the pollution spit out by the coal engines.  The New York legislature acted quickly to ban coal engines&#8217; entry into New York City, and forced the majors to go electric or to die.  They went electric, and the new beautiful Grand Central was born, and the train service was never disrupted in the process.</p>
<p>I was amazed to see how quickly the captains of industry were forced to modify their bread and butter in the name of the public welfare&#8211;such a stark contrast to the tepid environmental regulations that have <a href="http://www.autolife.umd.umich.edu/Environment/E_Overview/E_Overview4.htm">slodged through Congress in more recent history</a>.  One of the show&#8217;s historians said that it was useless for them to resist the teeming public sentiment, the socialist and populism clamor was a force too large to be reckoned with, and the railroad was lucky to get out with what it got.</p>
<p>This made me feel a bit envious, I&#8217;ll admit.  Not since that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilded_age">gilded age</a> have the wealthy and elite been so far removed from the rest of society as they are in <a href="http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&amp;aid=7762">this part of the 21st century</a>.  But where is our public outrage, our populist movement, and where is our yellow journalism calling for reform?  Have the Rupert Murdochs simply done better than their forebears by convincing 5 x more Americans to pay more attention to <a href="http://tvbythenumbers.com/2008/02/06/nielsen-ratings-tue-feb-5-all-fox/2596">last night&#8217;s American Idol than to its Super Tuesday results</a>?  Why is it that slightly better than half the voters, far from outraged or disgusted, buy into the notion that the <a href="http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/archives/005045.php">free market will sort it all out</a>?</p>
<p>Beats me.  All I know is that this righteous indignation has made me hungry.  I&#8217;m off to lunch at <a href="http://midtownlunch.wordpress.com/2006/09/25/grand-central-terminal-food-court/">Grand Central, with other yuppies </a>who get paid well doing the Man&#8217;s dirty work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/02/06/grand-central/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>daggummit</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/01/15/daggummit/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/01/15/daggummit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Liberal Media Conspiracies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last.fm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/01/15/daggummit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, then surely the path to the bathroom at the &#8220;primitive&#8221; rest stop is paved with Essential Lists. Just for fun(?), I&#8217;d see which 120 Essential pop records I own. 
Spoiler Alert!! Not to be found in this list: Guns N Roses, AC/DC, Michael Jackson, Replacements, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the road to hell is paved with good intentions, then surely the path to the bathroom at the &#8220;primitive&#8221; rest stop is paved with Essential Lists. Just for fun(?), I&#8217;d see which <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2008/01/13/sv_100rockalbums.xml">120 Essential pop records</a> I own. </p>
<p>Spoiler Alert!! Not to be found in this list: Guns N Roses, AC/DC, Michael Jackson, Replacements, Eric B. &#038; Rakim, Bruce Springsteen, or Bob Goulet! But for serious, this list may have pissed me off more than any other list in the history of the internet. That&#8217;s how feeble I am.</p>
<p><strong>Jimi Hendrix &#8211; Electric Ladyland (1968)</strong>: Nope. Are You Experienced (+ BMG&#8217;s Greatest Hits)<br />
<strong>Fela Kuti &#8211; Music is the Weapon (1999)</strong><br />
<strong>Kraftwerk &#8211; Radioactivity (1975)</strong>: Nein. I think I&#8217;m all set with my Napster-era copy of &#8220;Autobahn&#8221;.<br />
<strong>Janet Jackson &#8211; Damita Jo (2004)</strong>: I&#8217;m going to stop saying &#8220;no&#8221; unless otherwise appropriate<br />
<strong>TseguÃ©-Maryam GuÃ¨brou &#8211; Ã‰thiopiques 21 (2006)</strong><br />
<strong>Various Artists &#8211; American Primitive Vol II</strong>: Compilations? Questionable. Why not &#8220;Freedom Rock&#8221;, then?<br />
<strong>Palace Brothers &#8211; Palace Brothers (1994)</strong><br />
<strong>The Shangri-Las &#8211; Teen Anguish Vol II (1980)</strong><br />
<strong>John Betjeman &#8211; Betjeman&#8217;s Banana Blush (1974)</strong><br />
<strong>BeyoncÃ© &#8211; B-Day Deluxe Edition (2007)</strong><br />
<strong>Beastie Boys &#8211; Licensed To Ill (1986)</strong>: My first &#8220;yes&#8221;. On Wax &#038; CD both.<br />
<strong>The Impressions &#8211; Definitive Impressions Vol 1 (2002)</strong><br />
<strong>Various Artists &#8211; The Soundtrack to Rushmore (1999)</strong>: Yes, though I still think this list is double-dirty for including compilations. Still my favorite W. Anderson movie (after Bottle Rockets &#8211; which likely is getting by for sentimental reasons).<br />
<strong>Ghostface Killah &#8211; Iron Man (1996)</strong><br />
<strong>Minor Threat &#8211; The Complete Discography (1989)</strong><br />
<strong>Meat Puppets &#8211; Meat Puppets II (1984)</strong><br />
<strong>Neil Young &#8211; On The Beach (1974)</strong><br />
<strong>Captain Beefheart &#8211; Clear Spot (1972)</strong><br />
<strong>Prinzhorn Dance School &#8211; Prinzhorn Dance School (2007)</strong><br />
<strong>Various Artists &#8211; The Forgotten Guitars of Mozambique 1955,56,57 (2003)</strong><br />
<strong>Moondog &#8211; Moondog 1&#038;2 (1969/1970)</strong><br />
<strong>Aphex Twin &#8211; Richard D. James Album (1996)</strong><br />
<strong>Lee Perry &#8211; The Upsetter Boxed Set (1972/1974)</strong><br />
<strong>Cymande &#8211; Best of Cymande (1992)</strong><br />
<strong>The Specials &#8211; The Specials (1979)</strong><br />
<strong>Dizzee Rascal &#8211; Boy In Da Corner (2003)</strong>: WTF?<br />
<strong>Karen Dalton &#8211; It&#8217;s So Hard To Tell Who&#8217;s Going To Love You The Best (1969)</strong><br />
<strong>Miles Davis &#8211; In a Silent Way (1969)</strong><br />
<strong>Gorky&#8217;s Zygotic Mynci &#8211; Barafundle (1997)</strong><br />
<strong>Radiohead &#8211; OK Computer (1997)</strong><br />
<strong>Pink Floyd &#8211; Atom Heart Mother (1970)</strong><br />
<strong>Fatboy Slim &#8211; You&#8217;ve Come a Long Way Baby (1998)</strong><br />
<strong>Logh &#8211; Every Time a Bell Rings an Angel Gets His Wings (2002)</strong><br />
<strong>The Divine Comedy &#8211; Promenade (1994)</strong><br />
<strong>Neil Young &#8211; Harvest (1972)</strong>: My 2nd &#8220;yes&#8221;. Neil Young shows up 2x before The Beatles or Led Zeppelin for those &#8220;scoring&#8221; at &#8220;home&#8221;.<br />
<strong>Ulrich Schnauss &#8211; Far Away Trains Passing By (2001)</strong><br />
<strong>The Smiths &#8211; The Queen Is Dead (1986)</strong><br />
<strong>P.J. Harvey &#8211; Stories From The City, Stories From The Sea (2000)</strong><br />
<strong>Portishead &#8211; Dummy (1994)</strong>: My 3rd &#8220;Yes&#8221;. I like this a lot, but I don&#8217;t think it would make my top 120. I&#8217;m really beginning to wonder, why they chose the &#8220;pop&#8221; designation for this list.<br />
<strong>Goldfrapp &#8211; Supernature (2005)</strong><br />
<strong>Roxy Music &#8211; For Your Pleasure (1974)</strong><br />
<strong>Johnny Cash &#8211; American III (2000)</strong><br />
<strong>The Killers &#8211; Hot Fuss (2004)</strong>. Did I mention there is no Depeche Mode on this list?<br />
<strong>Moby &#8211; Play (1999)</strong><br />
<strong>Pet Shop Boys &#8211; Very (1993)</strong><br />
<strong>Kate Bush &#8211; Hounds Of Love (1985)</strong><br />
<strong>REM &#8211; Automatic For The People (1992)</strong>. Yes. But, really. Why are you still reading this?<br />
<strong>Led Zeppelin &#8211; IV (1971).</strong> Yes. Finally. Does anybody <em>not</em> own this album?<br />
<strong>Velvet Underground and Nico &#8211; &#8216;Banana album&#8217; (1967)</strong>. And boom goes the dynamite. (Yes).<br />
<strong>Massive Attack &#8211; Mezzanine (1998)</strong><br />
<strong>Love &#8211; Forever Changes (1967)</strong><br />
<strong>Underworld &#8211; Beaucoup Fish (1999)</strong><br />
<strong>DJ Shadow &#8211; Endtroducing (1996)</strong>. Yes &#038; Yes again. Truly an essential album.<br />
<strong>Kraftwerk &#8211; Trans Europe Express (1977)</strong><br />
<strong>Human League &#8211; Dare (1981)</strong><br />
<strong>Beatles &#8211; Sgt Pepper&#8217;s Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967)</strong>. Yes. Duh.<br />
<strong>Aphrodite &#8211; Aftershock (2002)</strong><br />
<strong>David Bowie &#8211; Hunky Dory (1971)</strong><br />
<strong>Tindersticks &#8211; Second Album (1995)</strong><br />
<strong>Bob Dylan &#8211; Shot of Love (1981)</strong><br />
<strong>Japan &#8211; Tin Drum (1981)</strong><br />
<strong>Brian Eno &#8211; Another Green World (1975)</strong><br />
<strong>Magazine &#8211; The Correct Use of Soap (1980)</strong><br />
<strong>The Velvet Underground &#8211; 1969 (1974)</strong><br />
<strong>BjÃ¶rk &#8211; Debut (1993)</strong>: Yes.<br />
<strong>The B52&#8217;s &#8211; The B52&#8217;s (1979)</strong><br />
<strong>Captain Beefheart &#8211; Trout Mask Replica (1969)</strong><br />
<strong>Television &#8211; Marquee Moon (1977)</strong><br />
<strong>Neil Young &#8211; On The Beach (1974)</strong>. For the second time. This must be the greatest record ever made.<br />
<strong>Little Richard &#8211; Here&#8217;s Little Richard (1957)</strong><br />
<strong>Family &#8211; Music in a Doll&#8217;s House (1968</strong>)<br />
<strong>Todd Rundgren &#8211; Todd (1974)</strong><br />
<strong>Morrissey &#8211; Viva Hate (1988)</strong><br />
<strong>Talk Talk &#8211; Laughing Stock (1991)</strong><br />
<strong>Cat Power &#8211; The Greatest (2006)</strong>: Yes.<br />
<strong>This Heat &#8211; This Heat (1978)</strong><br />
<strong>Murcof &#8211; Martes (2002)</strong><br />
<strong>Groundhogs &#8211; Split (1971)</strong><br />
<strong>Richard and Linda Thompson &#8211; I Wanna See The Bright Lights Tonight (1974)</strong><br />
<strong>Kevin Coyne &#8211; Marjory Razorblade (1973)</strong><br />
<strong>Roy Harper &#8211; Stormcock (1971)</strong><br />
<strong>Soft Machine &#8211; Third (1970)</strong><br />
<strong>Van Der Graaf Generator &#8211; Pawn Hearts (1971)</strong><br />
<strong>Aimee Mann &#8211; Bachelor Number 2 (2000)</strong><br />
<strong>Tangerine Dream &#8211; Phaedra (1974)</strong><br />
<strong>Billy Fury &#8211; Sound of Fury (1960)</strong><br />
<strong>The Rutles &#8211; the Rutles (1978)</strong><br />
<strong>Public Image &#8211; Metal Box (1979</strong>)<br />
<strong>Joy Division &#8211; Closer (1980)</strong>: Yes.<br />
<strong>Bob Dylan &#8211; Bringing It All Back Home (1965)</strong><br />
<strong>Beach Boys &#8211; Pet Sounds (1966)</strong>: Yes.<br />
<strong>The Beatles &#8211; The Beatles (1968)</strong><br />
<strong>The Rolling Stones &#8211; Beggars Banquet (1968)</strong><br />
<strong>Van Morrison &#8211; Astral Weeks (1969)</strong><br />
<strong>Led Zeppelin &#8211; Led Zeppelin II (1969)</strong>: Yes<br />
<strong>Pink Floyd &#8211; Wish You Were Here (1975)</strong>: Yes.<br />
<strong>The Sex Pistols &#8211; Never Mind The Bollocks (1977)</strong><br />
<strong>Nirvana &#8211; Nevermind (1991)</strong><br />
<strong>The White Stripes &#8211; Elephant (2002)</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2008/01/15/daggummit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>hip-hop powerpoints</title>
		<link>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2007/11/09/hip-hop-powerpoints/</link>
		<comments>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2007/11/09/hip-hop-powerpoints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Last.fm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2007/11/09/hip-hop-powerpoints/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a few keepers in here

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a few keepers in <a href="http://www.jamphat.com/rap/">here</a></p>
<p><img src="http://www.jamphat.com/rap/index_files/image025.jpg" alt="93 to Infinity" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blackmarketkidneys.com/blog/2007/11/09/hip-hop-powerpoints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
